Juwan Johnson is on bye in Week 8 — replace him and revisit next week.
- Projection
- 4.4 pts
- TE rank
- #25
- Matchup
- bye
Juwan Johnson's fantasy role in Week 8
Juwan Johnson goes into Week 8 of the 2026 season as a bench stash most leagues are holding for the NO. He is rostered in 60% of leagues and actually started in 17% of them, and we rank him TE25 on our own weekly board at 4.4 projected points.
Interest is cooling — roster rates slipped roughly 9% in the last week, so he is getting cheaper to acquire if you believe in the role.
No injury designation to work around right now, which keeps his projection honest.
Week 8 matchup breakdown
The NO are on bye in Week 8, so there is no matchup to grade. Anyone holding him needs a one-week fill-in from the waiver wire.
How to play it
Juwan Johnson is on bye in Week 8 — replace him and revisit next week.
Use the waiver wire for a one-week plug and keep him on your bench if you are otherwise healthy at TE.
Sally's take
Peppers & Picks ranks Juwan Johnson (NO TE), our TE25 this week for Week 8 of the 2026 NFL season (his team is on bye), projecting 4.4 projected points with a mild Pepper Meter rating. Sally's honest about it: 2.6 points under the starter line isn't the ceiling she chases. He's being dropped at a 8.7% clip, and I don't think the market is wrong about it. 17% of managers already start him, and the depth-chart role behind that number looks stable. He grades 37% below the average weekly TE number, which is a floor problem more than a ceiling one. The Pepper Meter cools him to Mild, and that reading is doing its job.
Tina's take
Peppers & Picks ranks Juwan Johnson (NO TE), our TE25 this week for Week 8 of the 2026 NFL season (his team is on bye), projecting 4.4 projected points with a mild Pepper Meter rating. Tina calls it a floor problem: 2.6 points under the starter line is a lot of risk for a lineup spot. He's without an opponent this week, which caps this at a roster-hold conversation. He's being dropped at a 8.7% clip, and I don't think the market is wrong about it. 17% of managers already start him, and the depth-chart role behind that number looks stable. Tina keeps him at Mild until the usage says otherwise.